History of Biology: Cell Theory and Cell Structure

All living organisms are composed of cells, and all cells arise from other cells. These simple and powerful statements form the basis of the cell the­ory, first formulated by a group of European biologists in the mid-1800s. So fundamental are these ideas to biology that it is easy to forget they were not always thought to be true.

Early Observations

The invention of the microscope allowed the first view of cells. English physicist and microscopist Robert Hooke (1635-1702) first described cells in 1665. He made thin slices of cork and likened the boxy partitions he ob­served to the cells (small rooms) in a monastery. The open spaces Hooke observed were empty, but he and others suggested these spaces might be used for fluid transport in living plants. He did not propose, and gave no indication that he believed, that these structures represented the basic unit of living organisms.

Marcello Malpighi (1628-1694), and Hooke’s colleague, Nehemiah Grew (1641-1712), made detailed studies of plant cells and established the presence of cellular structures throughout the plant body. Grew likened the cellular spaces to the gas bubbles in rising bread and suggested they may have formed through a similar process. The presence of cells in animal tis­sue was demonstrated later than in plants because the thin sections needed for viewing under the microscope are more difficult to prepare for animal tissues. The prevalent view of Hooke’s contemporaries was that animals were composed of several types of fibers, the various properties of which ac­counted for the differences among tissues.

At the time, virtually all biologists were convinced that organisms were composed of some type of fundamental unit, and it was these “atomistic” preconceptions that drove them to look for such units. While improvements in microscopy made their observations better, it was the underlying belief that there was some fundamental substructure that made the microscope the instrument of choice in the study of life.

In 1676 the Dutch microscopist Antony van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) published his observations of single-cell organisms, or “little animalcules” as he called them. It is likely that Leeuwenhoek was the first person to ob­serve a red blood cell and a sperm cell. Leeuwenhoek made numerous and detailed observations on his microorganisms, but more than one hundred years passed before a connection was made between the obviously cellular structure of these creatures and the existence of cells in animals or plants.

The Development of the Cell Theory

In 1824 Frenchman Henri Milne-Edwards suggested that the basic struc­ture of all animal tissues was an array of “globules,” though his insistence on uniform size for these globules puts into question the accuracy of his ob­servations. Henri Dutrochet (1776-1847) made the connection between plant cells and animal cells explicit, and he proposed that the cell was not just a structural but also a physiological unit: “It is clear that it constitutes the basic unit of the organized state; indeed, everything is ultimately de­rived from the cell” (Harris 1999, p. 29). Dutrochet proposed that new cells arise from within old ones, a view that was echoed by his contemporary Francois Raspail (1794-1878). Raspail was the first to state one of the two major tenets of cell theory: Omnis cellula e cellula, which means “Every cell is derived from another cell.” However, despite this ringing and famous phrase, his proposed mechanism of cell generation was incorrect. Raspail was also the founder of cell biochemistry, making experiments on the chem­ical composition of the cell and their response to changing chemical envi­ronments.

In 1832 Barthelemy Dumortier (1797-1878) of France described “bi­nary fission” (cell division) in plants. He observed the formation of a mid­line partition between the original cell and the new cell, which, Dumortier noted, “seems to us to provide a perfectly clear explanation of the origin and development of cells, which has hitherto remained unexplained” (Har­ris 1999, p. 66) These observations led him to reject the idea that new cells arise from within old ones, or that they form spontaneously from noncellular material. The discovery of cell division is usually attributed to Hugo von Mohl (1805-1872), but Dumortier proceeded him in this regard. Von Mohl did coin the word “protoplasm” for the material contained in the cell.

The first unequivocal description of the cell nucleus was made by a Czech, Franz Bauer, in 1802 and was given its name in 1831 by Robert Brown (1773-1858) of Scotland, who is best remembered for discovering the random “Brownian” motion of molecules. The first accurate description of the nucleolus was made in 1835.

Schleiden and Schwann, who are usually given credit for elucidating the cell theory, made their marks in 1838 and 1839. In 1838 Matthais Schlei- den (1804-1881) proposed that every structural element of plants is com­posed of cells or the products of cells. However, Schleiden insisted on priority for several ideas that were not his and clung to the idea that cells arise by a crystallization-like process either within other cells or from out­side, which Dumortier had dispensed with some years earlier. (In Schlei- den’s defense, it should be remembered that drawing incorrect conclusions from limited observations is a risk inherent in science, especially when work­ing on the frontier of a new field.)

In 1839 a fellow German, Theodor Schwann (1810-1882), proposed that in animals too every structural element is composed of cells or cell prod­ucts. Schwann’s contribution might be regarded as the more groundbreak­ing, since the understanding of animal structure lagged behind that of plants. In addition, Schwann made the explicit claim that the fundamental laws gov­erning cells were identical between plants and animals: “A common princi­ple underlies the development of all the individual elementary subunits of all organisms” (Harris 1999, p. 102).

A special word should be said here about the Czech Jan Purkyne (1787-1869), or Purkinje, as his name is usually given. Purkinje was the pre­miere cytologist of his day, and one of the most influential formulators of the cell theory. He gave his name to structures throughout the body, in­cluding the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. Purkinje, in fact, deserves much of the credit that usually goes to Schwann, for in 1837 he proposed not only that animals were composed principally of cells and cell products (though he left room for fibers) but also that the “basic cellular tissue is again clearly analogous to that of plants” (Harris 1999, p. 92). Unfortunately, Schwann did not credit Purkinje in his influential publication.

Reproduction and Inheritance

Despite the work of Dumortier, the origins of new cells remained contro­versial and confused. In 1852 a German, Robert Remak (1852-1865), pub­lished his observations on cell division, stating categorically that the generation schemes proposed by Schleiden and Schwann were wrong. Based on his observations of embryos, Remak stated instead that binary fission was the means of reproduction of new animal cells. This view was widely pub­licized not by Remak but by Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902), unfortunately without crediting Remak. Virchow is also usually given the credit for the phrase Omnis cellula e cellula, indicating the importance of cell division in the creation of new cells.

The understanding of the central importance of chromosomes lagged well behind their discovery. In 1879 Walther Flemming (1843-1905) noted that the chromosomes split longitudinally during mitosis (a term he intro­duced). Wilhelm Roux (1850-1924) proposed that each chromosome car­ried a different set of hereditable elements and suggested that the longitudinal splitting observed by Flemming ensured the equal division of these elements. This scheme was confirmed in 1904 by Theodor Boveri (1862-1915). Combined with the rediscovery of Gregor Mendel’s 1866 pa­per on heritable elements in peas, these results highlighted the central role of the chromosomes in carrying genetic material. The chemical nature of the gene was determined in a series of experiments over the next fifty years, culminating in the determination of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in 1953 by James Watson and Francis Crick.

Modern Advances

The modern understanding of cellular substructure began with the use of the electron microscope. Keith Porter (1912-1997) was a pioneer in this field and was the first to identify the endoplasmic reticulum and many elements of the cytoskeleton. The explosion of knowledge brought about by improvements in microscopy, biochemistry, and genetics has led to a depth of understanding of cell structure and function undreamed of by the earliest cell biologists.

References

Harris, Henry. The Birth of the Cell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.

Magner, Lois N. History of Life Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994.