

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The demonstrative channel
المؤلف:
Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
المصدر:
The Genesis of Grammar
الجزء والصفحة:
P240-C5
2026-03-17
54
The demonstrative channel
As in the noun channel, the strategy underlying this channel involves a complement of the main clause which is grammaticalized to a complementizer. The complement in this case is a demonstrative pronoun (not a demonstrative attribute), which is either distal (‘that’) or proximal (‘this’). Accordingly, a structure underlying something like sentence (44a) is grammaticalized into (44b). The main effects of grammaticalization are summarized in (45).

This process has been described in some detail for Germanic languages such as English, German, and Faroese (Lockwood 1968: 222–3; Heine, Claudi, and Hünnemeyer 1991: 180; Hopper and Traugott 1993: 185–9; Harris and Campbell 1995: 287–8; Heine and Kuteva 2002a). An example from the Australian language Gunwinggu is discussed by Hopper and Traugott (2003: 185). The following case is taken from the !Xun language of south western Africa; cf. (46): The use of the proximal demonstrative pronoun kā ē ‘this’ (referring to nouns of the inanimate noun class 4 [N4]) is exemplified in (46a). In (46b) there are two clauses, where the second clause is interpreted as a complement of the first clause, and the demonstrative pronoun kā ē as a complementizer introducing the second clause, even if it could also be interpreted in its non-grammaticalized sense, where (46b) could be translated roughly as ‘Ask him this: he’ll be at home tomorrow’.

The development from the demonstrative kā ē to the complementizer kā-ē involved all of the parameters of grammaticalization: Extension had the effect that the form was used in a new kind of context, namely at the beginning of a clause, desemanticization led to loss of spatial deixis, decategorialization meant that the form no longer participates in the variable paradigm of demonstrative categories, and erosion had the effect that the glottal stop and the contour tone (high–low) of the demonstrative [kāʔḕ] was lost in the complementizer, which is [kāē], or even [kē].
In the early stages of development, the grammaticalization from demonstrative pronoun to complementizer tends to be confined to object complements, and in many languages the process has stopped at this point. But in other languages, the process has proceeded further, in that the use of the complementizer was extended to subject complements. For example, the English distal demonstrative that acquired uses as an object complementizer already in Old English, while its use as a subject complementizer in subject position did not evolve prior to the fourteenth century (Hopper and Traugott 2003: 194).1
Diachronic evidence for this evolution comes from languages where we have sufficient historical records, such as English, German, etc.: Items such as English that were first used as demonstratives before their use was extended to also serve as complementizers. Germanic languages abound with examples showing that the process from demonstrative pronoun in the matrix clause to conjunction introducing complement clauses is documented by means of historical evidence. An example from Faroese is discussed by Lockwood (1968: 222–3; see also Heine, Claudi, and Hünnemeyer 1991: 180); the development of the English complementizer that is discussed by Hopper and Traugott (2003: 190–4), and Harris and Campbell (1995: 287f.) analyze the development of German das/dass ‘that’. Conversely, we are not aware of any data that would suggest that, in the history of English or of any other languages, complementizers developed into demonstratives.
1 There is an example of that from ca. 1000 AD where it appears to be a subject complementizer, though not in subject position (Hopper and Traugott 2003: 192, ex. (41)).
الاكثر قراءة في Clauses
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)