المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6109 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر
تربية الماشية في جمهورية مصر العربية
2024-11-06
The structure of the tone-unit
2024-11-06
IIntonation The tone-unit
2024-11-06
Tones on other words
2024-11-06
Level _yes_ no
2024-11-06
تنفيذ وتقييم خطة إعادة الهيكلة (إعداد خطة إعادة الهيكلة1)
2024-11-05

مفاعل غير متجانس heterogeneous reactor
23-2-2020
معنى كلمة رصد
2-4-2022
Blood clotting (coagulation)
7-1-2022
صلاة الكسوف
2023-08-20
مصداق الفساد والطغيان في الآية 60 من سورة البقرة
2023-05-25
مزارع المحاليل المغذية (مزارع البينات الصلبة)
19-4-2017

Vowel length KIT  
  
839   08:43 صباحاً   date: 2024-02-13
Author : Jane Stuart-Smith
Book or Source : A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
Page and Part : 57-3


Read More
Date: 2023-08-25 612
Date: 2024-06-11 315
Date: 2024-05-03 391

Vowel length

KIT

The usual realization of this vowel in ScStE is [I], though it is often more open . Corresponding to KIT is Scots BIT which is generally in the region of  but in certain contexts, e.g. after labials, as in milk, fill, may be substantially lowered and retracted and even merged with CUT (Johnston 1997: 468). A socio-phonetic continuum stretches between KIT/BIT, such that the realization shows clear differences according to class. This has been investigated in Edinburgh (Johnston and Speitel 1983) and Glasgow in the 1970s (Macaulay 1977) and again in the 1990s (Stuart-Smith 1999: 207). In all cases lower-class speakers used lower and more retracted variants than those of higher-class speakers. In a recent study by Viktoria Eremeeva and myself, acoustic data from male Glaswegian speakers show middle-class men using the highest vowels, but middle-class boys using the frontest variants, but lower, at the same height as working-class speakers. Interestingly, in spontaneous speech working-class boys are not as retracted as working-class men, suggesting a move away from stereotypically retracted localized variants for this vowel. Though not part of our analysis, we also noticed that  was usual even in contexts where CUT would be expected in these speakers.