Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Between what is said and what is implicated
المؤلف:
Jonathan Culpeper and Michael Haugh
المصدر:
Pragmatics and the English Language
الجزء والصفحة:
102-4
6-5-2022
689
Between what is said and what is implicated
While a speaker can mean both what is said and what is implicated, Grice’s main focus in theorizing meaning nn, as we have seen, was on what is implicated. He thus left what is said as something for those working in semantics to deal with. However, the assumption that speaker meaning is exhausted by Grice’s notion of what is said and what is implicated has been challenged by subsequent work where it has been argued that pragmatics is, in fact, required in order to account for what is taken to be said. In other words, a complex layer of pragmatic meaning representation has been found to lie between Grice’s minimalist notion of what is said and particularized conversational implicatures. At the risk of gross oversimplification, the various developments of pragmatic meaning representations can be roughly grouped into two schools. On the one hand, we have the so-called neo-Griceans who have expanded upon and further developed Grice’s original distinction between what is said and what is implicated.
They have emphasized the role of general expectations in relation to implicatures, focusing, in particular, on developing a more detailed account of generalized conversational implicatures. Neo-Gricean work has also tended towards a defence of a literalist notion of what is said, thereby maintaining a firmer boundary with semantics. On the other hand, post-Griceans, in particular Relevance theorists, have argued that we need a pragmatically enriched or contextualist notion of what is said, thereby abandoning Grice’s essentially syntactically-constrained conceptualization. They have focused on offering a detailed account of these pragmatic enrichments of what is said, leading to a much more looser boundary between the treatment of meaning representations in semantics and pragmatics. Another notable feature of post-Gricean approaches to pragmatic meaning is the shift away from a (neo-)Gricean focus on what a speaker intends to mean to a focus on how hearers figure out what speakers are meaning.
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
