Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Reflection: Marking definiteness
المؤلف:
Jonathan Culpeper and Michael Haugh
المصدر:
Pragmatics and the English Language
الجزء والصفحة:
18-2
23-4-2022
430
Reflection: Marking definiteness
Many European languages are like English in having a separate word (or words) marking definiteness. Other languages, such as the Scandinavian languages Danish, Norwegian, Swedish and Icelandic and the Semitic languages Hebrew, Arabic and Kurdish, use an affix rather than a separate word. Yet other languages, such as Latvian, Xhosa and Indonesian, regularly deploy a demonstrative (e.g. this, that) for this purpose. English can also use a demonstrative to signal definiteness (try substituting this or that for the in sentence [2.3(a)] above), but it is not regularly deployed just to mark definiteness in the way that the is. Still other languages, such as Chinese, Japanese and Russian (and many other Slavic languages), use none of these resources to mark definiteness. This is why, of course, a distinctive feature of English spoken by speakers of these languages is the lack of the definite article (consider this sentence written by a Japanese pragmatics student: It is principle of conversation). Indeed, some research on marking definiteness in English in interactions where all the participants are “non-native” speakers, has suggested that dropping the definite article in some instances where it would be required in “standard” forms of English, and inserting it where it would not normally be grammatically required, is a feature of English as a lingua franca (see, for instance, Seidlhofer 2001).
It is not the case that any one form, such as the examples of definite expressions in Table 2.1, will always have a referring function, which, incidentally, is partly why these are pragmatic, not semantic, issues. Consider this sentence:
This is not likely to be referring to a particular bus but to any vehicle with the attributes of a bus. It is a non-referential, descriptive usage of a definite expression, as opposed to a referential usage (this distinction was labelled attributive versus referential by Donnellan 1966). Here, we are talking about buses as opposed to any other mode of transport: the definite expression invites the interpreter to work out the more general category (transport) of which this is a specific sub-category (buses). So, in this case, the definite expression is not used to signal an act of identification but a distinction between the specific and the general. Additionally, we might note here that indefinite expressions can also refer. Consider this sentence:
Clearly, we are referring to a particular, identifiable bus in a particular context, despite the fact that an indefinite article is used. Compare this with a non-referring usage of an indefinite expression, such as:
We will examine the functions of referring expressions, including defi nite expressions, more closely.
We use proper nouns to invite hearers to identify the unique individual (or set of individuals) we are talking about. Proper nouns inherently identify a unique individual (or set of individuals); they have definiteness built in (and thus appear as a sub-category of definite expressions in Table 2.1). This fact may partly explain why, in English, one would not normally put a definite article before a proper noun: the Jonathan or the Michael sounds decidedly odd (except in limited contexts such as that’s not the Jonathan I was talking about; see also the reflection box below). However, this is not a full explanation, because some other languages do allow a definite article before a proper noun. For example, in some dialects of Italian definite articles are systematically used before personal names (e.g. la Maria) and, in Italian generally, they are used before names of countries (e.g. la Germania). 2 This is not as bizarre as it may seem to the native English speaker. A century ago, Russell (1910–1911) argued that proper nouns are not just empty shells used to refer to a particular individual, but are associated with a descriptive content which determines what they refer to, somewhat like definite common noun phrases such as the book.
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
