

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Allomorphs
المؤلف:
Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman
المصدر:
What is Morphology
الجزء والصفحة:
P74-C3
2026-04-04
31
Allomorphs
The term ‘allomorph’ was introduced in Thinking about Morphology and Morphological Analysis, in two con texts. In Kujamaat Jóola, we noted that the stem /baj-/ has two possible shapes, [baj-] and [bəj-], with [bəj-] occurring in the presence of a morpheme with an underlyingly tense vowel, and [baj-] elsewhere. In English, the plural marker comes in several shapes, among them [s] as in lips, [z] as in balls, [əz] as in roses, [n̩] as in oxen, and null as in sheep. We are most interested in alternations based purely on phonological context, as with the Kujamaat Jóola facts. In the English data, only the first three allomorphs of the plural suffix depend on phonological context. The last two, as in oxen and sheep, are lexical, and we will not be concerned with them here.
Like the English plural suffix -s, the English past tense suffix has three forms: [d], [t], and [əd]:
(1) [d]: blamed [blejmd], triggered [trɪɡərd], realized [rijəlajzd], sighed [sajd], rubbed [r∧bd]
[t]: jumped [ʤ∧mpt], licked [lɪkt], hushed [h∧ʃt], laughed [læft], itched [ɪtʃt]
[əd]:aided [ejɾəd], knighted [n∧jɾəd]
The distribution of the three allomorphs is predictable and parallel to the distribution of the three allomorphs of the English plural suffix. [d] is found on verbs ending in a vowel or a voiced consonant, with the exception of alveolar stop /d/. [t] is found on verbs that end with a voiceless consonant, with the exception of alveolar stop /t/. In verbs that end with /t/ or /d/ (generally realized in speech as [ɾ]), we find [əd].
We can formulate the distribution of the allomorphs in even simpler terms: the English past tense suffix is /d/. Where we find [t], the /d/ has assimilated to the preceding segment in voicing. Where we find [əd], the [ə] has been added by an automatic phonological rule of epenthesis (i.e., insertion of a phonological segment or segments) that is triggered by the fact that the final segment in the verb and the suffix itself agree in both place and continuancy. We can call /d/ the basic form or the basic allomorph of the English past tense suffix.
It is not always easy, or even possible, to determine the basic form of a morpheme. To do so, we must decide which form of a morpheme best accounts for the full range of data. Consider the two words from Classical Greek given below. The forms on the left are in the nominative case, used for subjects, and those on the right are in the genitive case.

On the basis of these two forms, we can hypothesize that the nominative in Greek is formed by the addition of -s and that the genitive is formed by the addition of -os. What then are the basic forms of the stems meaning ‘Ethiopian’ and ‘vein’? With respect to the first, the answer seems simple: comparing the nominative and genitive forms, we isolate aithiop-. Finding the basic stem meaning ‘vein’ is more difficult. It might be phlep-, the stem of the nominative, or phleb-, the stem of the genitive (cf. phlebotomist). Theoretically, it could also be neither. However, we want the basic form of the allomorph to be one that speakers would be able to posit on their own given the available evidence, and when given a problem set we have to assume that we, too, have all the relevant data.
If the basic form of the stem were phlep-, we would have no explanation for why speakers of Classical Greek did not simply add -os, as with aithiopos, yielding *phlepos. Positing an underlying stem of phleb- instead makes the genitive form phlebos understandable, and with an additional step of assimilation in voicing, it also allows us to explain the nominative form, phleps.

Allomorphs are often the product of assimilations like the one that takes /d/ to [t] in words like jumped, baked, or kissed, or that takes *phleb s to phleps. In the case of the English past tense suffix, the voicelessness of the final consonant in the verb spreads forward to the suffix in what we call progressive assimilation. In the Classical Greek example, the voicelessness of the nominative suffix moves in the opposite direction. We call this regressive assimilation.
Another example of regressive assimilation is found in Spanish. Word-final nasal consonants assimilate in place of articulation to a following consonant in many different contexts. For example, the preposition con ‘with’ has at least three phonetic realizations: [kom], [kon], and [koŋ]. (In fact, there are five phonetic realizations of con, but we are simplifying for clarity.) Their distribution is predictable, just like that of the English past tense suffixes. We find [kom] before labial consonants, [kon] before alveolars and vowels, and [koŋ] before velars. Again, we can identify a basic form, in this case /kon/. We know it is basic because it occurs in two unlike environments: before certain consonants and before all vowels.

Assimilation like that seen with Spanish con is rampant in the world’s languages and thus a frequent source of allomorphy.
Epenthesis is another common source of allomorphy. Frequently languages epenthesize consonants in contexts where a final vowel in one word would otherwise come up against an initial vowel in the following word, particularly when the two have a strong syntactic bond. We call this unwanted vowel–vowel contact hiatus. French is a language that doesn’t tolerate hiatus well, and it has various ways of eliminating it in certain syntactic contexts. The plural article les [le] ‘the’ is pronounced [lez] when it is followed by a vowel-initial word (5a); the masculine demonstrative ce [sə] becomes cet [sεt], which happens to be homophonous with the feminine demonstrative cette (5b); and the feminine genitive adjectives ma [ma], ta [ta], and sa [sa] are replaced by mon [mon], ton [ton], and son [son] (5c). The last three forms are identical in spelling to the masculine genitive adjectives mon, ton, son. Before a consonant, the vowel of the masculine genitive singular pronouns is nasalized and the final /n/ is not pronounced. It is only pronounced before vowel-initial words – another hiatus context (6).

In the Vallader dialect of Rumantsch, the prepositions da ‘from’ and a ‘to’ become dad and ad respectively before words beginning with a vowel:

An instructive case is that of Spanish, as shown by the following set of data. We have put stressed syllables in boldface type:

All of the Spanish nouns above are feminine, which may surprise you if you know already that el is the masculine definite article, and la is the feminine. In Spanish, la must be replaced by el before a feminine noun that begins with a stressed [a] (8a–g). This does not occur before any other vowel sound, as shown by the last two examples (8j, k). We include (8h) and (8i) because both abeja and harina begin with [a] but are stressed on the penultimate (second-to-last) syllable. This exempts them from the la → el rule.
We see that the Spanish anti-hiatus rule has a limited application. It applies only at the juncture between the feminine definite article and a stressed [a]. What’s more, it has at least two lexical exceptions: it does not apply in the case of la a ‘the a’ or la hache ‘the h’ (letters of the alpha bet).1 As morphologists, we are used to dealing with cases like this. Unlike syntax, which tends to be very regular, morphology is full of irregularities and exceptions.
1 A reader has pointed out that the exceptions of la a ‘the a’ and la hache ‘the h’ are reduced from la letra a ‘the letter a’ and la letra hache ‘the letter h’. Additionally, names of letters are often linguistically exceptional. In Ancient Greek, for example, although letter names are nouns, they do not take any inflectional endings.
الاكثر قراءة في Morphology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)