Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
Assessing creativity
المؤلف:
Gipsy Chang & Josephine Csete
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P456-C38
2025-08-22
96
Assessing creativity
Given the diverse nature of creativity, there is no single measure that can fully capture its essence. As commented by Puccio and Murdock (1999), "it is a non-productive way to approach creative assessment to assume that all-purpose creativity measures exist" (Puccio & Murdock 1999, p.10).
The assessment criteria can also be vague. As stated by Sefton-Green and others, "Inevitably, published criteria for assessment are largely comparative, although precisely what is being compared often remains unclear" (Buckingham, Fraser & Sefton-Green 2000). McGowan also discovered problems in assessment. She found disparity in the attempt to acquire consistency when dance teachers assessed the same solo dance pieces using common criteria. Common criteria for creative assessment that is not designed for the particular context can be vague. Wording such as "creative", "imaginative", or "novelty", with no particular reference and explanation, can be interpreted differently from person to person and even from time to time by the same person (McGowan 1982). One way to approach the assessment of this multi-dimensional attribute is to take a more ecological or interactionist approach (Amabile 1982). This means to employ multiple measurement methods to create a profile of information. Similar approaches have also been used by Guilford (1986), MacKinnon (1978) and many others in their studies.
Among the different measurements of the creativity of a person, the process, the product and the environment, MacKinnon (1978) referred to the creative product as the "bedrock" of creativity research. MacKinnon argued that the product was the one area through which researchers could discover much about the other facets of creativity. Examination of the product reflects qualities of the person who created the product, the process used to form the product, and aspects of the environment in which the product was developed. As Amabile (1982) stated, "a product-centered operational definition is clearly most useful for empirical research in creativity" (p.1001). The relationship between the four components is shown clearly in Treffinger's COCO Model (Figure 1). Many other researchers have also conducted research focused on the creative product. Besemer & Treffinger (1981) focused on the qualities that distinguish creative products from those that are less creative while Rogers (1983) was interested in the adoption of new ideas, practices, or objects by society.
Among the 4 essential components of creativity in the filmmaking context, approaching from the product aspect is considered most appropriate because the ultimate goal of making a film is for it to be projected in front of an audience. The final film (product) can reveal the ideology as well as the creative ability of the filmmaker (person). As Rhodes (1961) stated, "Products are the artefacts of thoughts." It is also the accumulation of the work process, from script to screen (process). Often, the finished film reflects its cultural and social context. For example, many Hollywood musicals were made during the Great Depression to cheer up the audience.
Analyzing creative products has long played an important role in the study of creativity and continues to be a significant concern of those involved in its assessment. Research studies on the level of creativeness of a product have been conducted by Treffinger and Poggio (1972), Skager, Schultz and Klein (1966), Besemer & Treffinger (1981) and many others. However, there are recurring problems such as definitions, aspects of originality, perceptions of those other than the creator and the practical administration of an assessing instrument. Besemer & Treffinger stated, "There is yet no conclusive 'set of criteria' for evaluating creative products." They suggested that "stating definitions and gaining consensus" can be helpful in achieving a set of criteria that is suitable for assessing creative products in a defined context (1981). Their statement sets the conceptual framework of my study.
الاكثر قراءة في Assessment
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
