Evaluatives in interrogatives

We noted that although evaluatives are not felicitous sentenceinitially in questions, they are possible if linearized in other positions. This holds not only for wh-questions, but also for polar questions:

This observation poses an interesting interface issue. Note that, leaving aside the problems posed by sentence-internal occurrences of adverbs, the fragment presented above can be extended quite easily to questions. All we need are appropriate definitions for a query utterance type parallel to (2) in the fragment of Grammar and an interrogative-clause type parallel to (1) in the fragment of Grammar. However the ban on initial occurrences is quite surprising. If only wh-questions were affected, one could assume that the head-filler-phrase turns a proposition into a question, and thus that evaluative adverbs are not possible on the left of the wh-phrase because they find no proposition to combine with. But in the case of polar questions no such account is available: since there is no overt marking of the polar interrogative status, we cannot forbid the possibility that the adverb combines with the (proposition-denoting) basic clause before the type-shifting from proposition to question occurs.

Although we presently have no account of the data in (1–2), we note that the phenomenon at hand might shed new light on the status of adverbs occurring in the initial position of questions in general. First, Bonami et al. (2004: 167–170) notes that the class of adverbs occurring sentence-initially in questions is quite odd, and corresponds only loosely to the set of adverbs that occur sentence-initially in assertions. Second, in assertions, it is clear that sentence-initial adverbs may scope lower than some sentence-internal operators, such as tense. As Bonami (2002) emphasizes, the choice of a perfective tense in (3a) can only be justified by the fact that this tense takes the sentenceinitial time-span adverbial in its scope. But initial adverbials in questions exhibit no evidence of a similar behavior: note in particular that time-span adverbials are infelicitous in this position (3b).

This and similar observations suggest that the syntax–semantics interface works quite differently for sentence-initial adverbials in assertions and in questions. A detailed investigation of this issue will have to await future work.

مواضيع ذات صلة

A case study of the semantics of clear - The framework – a version of Gunlogsons model of context update

Interpreting the experiencer of a discourse adjective

Discourse adjectives are not factive

Preliminary observations about discourse adjectives

Discourse adjectives Introduction

Prosody, scope, and pragmatic status

The fragment of grammar

On embedded evaluatives

Evaluative adverbs and dialogue - Modeling ancillary commitments

Evaluative adverbs and dialogue - Evaluatives as ancillary commitments

Evaluative adverbs and adjectives

The argument of evaluative adverbs