Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Interdependent but autonomous: Theorising phonological interaction in the Jamaica continuum/diglossic situation
المؤلف:
Hubert Devonish and Otelemate G. Harry
المصدر:
A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
479-27
2024-04-09
1026
Interdependent but autonomous: Theorising phonological interaction in the Jamaica continuum/diglossic situation
There is no way in which the assumption of underlying English phonology for JamC, by way of simplification and deletion rules, could account for the intermediate and even variant JamE forms. The frequent areas of overgeneralization in every aspect of the segmental phonological system discussed here suggests that JamE, for many speakers, is based on a JamC lexical input. A proposal for deletion rules, working from either JamE or from 17th century British English, would not produce the overgeneralizations discussed. Rules of elaboration, involving the lexical marking of some items to receive this elaboration, are a crucial part of the link between the phonological systems of JamC and JamE. It is the absence of lexical marking that produces the initial overgeneralizations.
Simultaneously, in the area of the prosodic system, we have seen what happens in the process of conversion from complex to simple. Since written English largely provided the model for the development of JamE, the fact that Standard British English and other metropolitan varieties of English were simple in this area had no impact on the conversion process. In fact, the greater complexity of JamE, relative to its external models, has gone unnoticed by speakers of JamE themselves. This fact underlines the largely written character of the model on which JamE has been built. It also supports the notion that much of the special lexical marking for conversion from JamC to JamE comes from cues given by the spellings of words in conventional English orthography.
The jury is out on whether a complex aspect of the phonology of a natively used variety can be suppressed in the acquisition of a non-native variety which is less complex. We would theorise that this would not occur unless strong social stigma were associated with this more complex set of features. Since, in the Jamaica situation, all the users of the potentially less complex system are also native users of the more complex one, the likelihood is that the greater complexity would go unnoticed, which is what we suggest happens with the complex JamC prosodic system in JamE. In addition, the distinction has some functional load. Thus, failure to carry it over into JamE would leave a communicative gap which would be noticed by speakers since they regard JamC and JamE as varieties of the same language.
The fact that, in pairs of related phonological variables, one variant would have a high frequency of occurrence in the variety to which it does not ideally belong, and that another would not, suggests that we are dealing with two language varieties which interact with each other, sharing on a variable basis some features of the other, but reserving other features for its own exclusive use. We have a pair of phonological systems that converge with each other but that are, in a systematic manner, nevertheless kept apart by their users.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
