

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Summary of omission conventions
المؤلف:
R.M.W. Dixon
المصدر:
A Semantic approach to English grammar
الجزء والصفحة:
74-2
2023-03-15
1764
Summary of omission conventions
The approach to grammatical description followed here involves relating together two constructions which differ only in that one includes and the other omits some minor element(s), and which appear to have essentially the same meaning. It generally seems appropriate to take the longer construction as more basic, and say that certain omissions are involved in the shorter.
It will be useful at this stage to summarize the major conventions for omission:
A. Omission of subject NP
A1. Under coordination. If two coordinated clauses share an NP which is in subject function in each, then this NP can be omitted from the second clause in sequence.
A2. In subordinate time clauses. One variety of temporal clause has its VP beginning with an -ing verb; if the subject of this clause is coreferential with the main clause subject then it must be omitted, e.g. (While) lying on the beach, Mary got sunstroke.
A3. From an ING complement clause. If the subject of an ING complement clause in object slot is coreferential with the main clause subject, or if the subject of an ING complement clause in subject slot is coreferential with the main clause object, then it is omitted, e.g. Mary hates having to wash up and Having to wash up annoys Mary. (An exception concerns ATTENTION verbs as head of the main clause predicate. Coreferentiality is rare, but if it is encountered then omission of the complement clause subject is not possible, e.g. John watched his fighting the tiger on a video replay.)
A4. From a Modal (FOR) TO complement clause.
The subject of a Modal (FOR) TO clause, in post-predicate position, must be omitted if it is coreferential with main clause subject, following one class of verbs, e.g. I need to mow the lawn; or if it is coreferential with main clause object, following another class of main verbs, e.g. I persuaded Mary to go. If the subject of a Modal (FOR) TO complement, in subject function, is coreferential with the main clause object, then this subject (and the preceding for) may optionally be omitted, e.g. (For her) to be expected to wash the car infuriated Mary. A WH- TO clause must have its subject coreferential with the main clause subject or object, and omitted.
B. Omission of complementiser that
The initial that may often be omitted from a complement clause when it immediately follows the main clause predicate (or predicate-plus-object NP where the predicate head is promise or threaten). The that is more often omitted in casual speech (e.g. chatting between friends) than in formal communication (e.g. in court or parliament). And it is more often omitted if the complement clause refers to some minor item of information than if it describes something of significance; this can be inferred from the meaning of the main verb used, and the NPs, and the context of utterance. Thus, in the (a) sentences below it would sound infelicitous to omit the that; in the (b) sentences that could be included but might be more likely to be omitted:
(102a) He promised that he would lend me two million dollars
(102b) He promised (that) he’d buy me an ice-cream
(103a) He mentioned that the king had died
(103b) He mentioned (that) Mary was coming to tea
C. Omission of relative pronoun wh-/that
A relative pronoun that or who, which, etc. may be omitted from a restrictive relative clause if the coreferential NP was not in subject function in the relative clause, e.g. The chair (that/which) you bought is the one (that/which) I sold last week. Once again, omission is more likely in a casual speech style, and when referring to something that is not of huge importance.
D. Omission of to be from complement clause
Some verbs taking a Judgement TO complement clause, whose VP begins with be, may omit to be, e.g. I thought him (to be) crazy. In addition, just a few verbs taking a Modal (FOR) TO complement whose VP begins with be may omit to be, e.g. I need my wound (to be) dressed.
E. Omission of predicate
If two coordinated clauses have the same predicate but different subject, object, etc. then the predicate may be omitted from the second clause (this is called ‘gapping’), e.g. John dug a long trench and Freddie (dug) a tiny hole.
F. Omission of modal should from a THAT complement
There is a class of verbs which carry an implication of obligation, similar to that of should. This modal may be omitted from a THAT complement clause following such a verb, e.g. He ordered that I (should) do it, and She suggested that John (should) propose the vote of thanks.
G. Omission of preposition before complementisers that, for and to
Certain transitive verbs which have a preposition as the last element in their lexical form may take a complement clause in object function. The preposition is omitted before that, for or to, although it is retained before an ING complement clause or a plain NP as object (and may optionally be retained before a WH- clause), e.g. He confessed to the crime, He confessed to strangling Mary, but He confessed (*to) that he had strangled Mary.
H. Omission of complementiser to
This must be omitted following a subtype of ATTENTION verbs, and following make, have or let; it can optionally be omitted following help or know. For example, He let Mary (*to) go; They heard John (*to) sing in the bath; She helped John (to) wash up. Note that to is not omitted from the corresponding passive, e.g. John was heard to sing in the bath.
I. Omission of after/while
A time clause whose VP begins with an -ing verb may omit the initial after if the first word of the VP is the previous aspect auxiliary have, e.g. (After) having dug the garden, John had a shower. Similarly, an initial while may be—but less often is—omitted if the VP begins with a lexical verb, e.g. John caught a bad cold (while) waiting for the bus.
J. Omission of in order
The clause linker in order is usually omitted before to or for, e.g. Fred rose early (in order) to get to work on time, and it may occasionally be omitted before that.
الاكثر قراءة في Semantics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)