Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Yes–no questions
المؤلف:
Andrew Radford
المصدر:
Minimalist Syntax
الجزء والصفحة:
220-6
19-1-2023
1346
Yes–no questions
Implicit in our earlier claim (41) is the following assumption about wh-questions in English:
This assumption has interesting implications for the syntax of yes–no questions such as:
It implies that not only wh-questions but also yes–no questions are CPs containing an interrogative specifier. But what kind of specifier could yes–no questions contain? The answer suggested in Grimshaw (1993) and Roberts (1993) is that they contain a null question operator which is directly generated in spec-CP (i.e. which is positioned in spec-CP by simple merger rather than movement). From a historical perspective, the null-operator analysis is by no means implausible, since in Elizabethan English we found main-clause yes–no questions introduced by the overt question word whether, as illustrated below:
Given the null-operator analysis of yes–no questions, we can posit that yes– no questions have essentially the same syntax in present-day English as in Elizabethan English, save that yes–no questions could be introduced by the overt interrogative operator whether in Elizabethan English, but are introduced by a null interrogative operator (a null counterpart of whether) in present-day English.
A second piece of evidence in support of the null-operator analysis comes from the fact that yes–no questions can be introduced by whether when they are transposed into reported speech (and so occur in a complement clause), as we see from the examples below:
A third piece of evidence is that yes–no questions with auxiliary inversion resemble whether questions in that in both cases yes/no are appropriate answers:
A fourth argument is that main-clause yes–no questions can be tagged by or not in precisely the same way as complement-clause whether questions:
If yes–no questions are CPs containing a null yes–no question operator (a null counterpart of whether) in spec-CP, we can arrive at a unitary characterization of questions as CPs with an interrogative specifier.
What all of this means is that (69) Is it raining? will be derived as follows. The present-tense auxiliary is merges with the verb raining to form the T-bar is raining. The resulting T-bar merges with the subject it to form the TP it is raining. This TP in turn merges with a null C which has [TNS, WH, EPP] features. The [TNS] feature of C attracts (a copy of) the T constituent is to merge with C; the requirement imposed by the [WH, EPP] features of C for CP to contain a wh-specifier is satisfied by merging a null yes–no question operator in spec-CP (which, for concreteness, we can take to be a null counterpart of the adverb whether, below symbolized as weather ), ultimately deriving the structure shown below (after deletion of the features of C and of the original occurrence of is):
If we take the yes–no question operator to be a null counterpart of whether, the lexical entry for whether will need to specify that it receives a null spellout in main clauses but is spelled out as |weðə| elsewhere.
الاكثر قراءة في Syntax
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
