Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Realizational differences
المؤلف:
April Mc Mahon
المصدر:
An introduction of English phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
99-8
19-3-2022
1651
Realizational differences
In the second type of accent difference, part of the system of phonemes may be the same for two or more accents, but the realizations of that phoneme or set of phonemes will vary. For instance, in SSBE, SSE and GA, /l/ has two main allophones, being clear, or alveolar [l] before a stressed vowel, as in light, clear, but dark, velarized after a stressed vowel, as in dull, hill. This distribution of allophones is not the only possibility in English, however. In some accents, /l/ is always realized as clear; this is true, for instance, of Tyneside English (or ‘Geordie’), Welsh English, and some South African varieties. On the other hand, in Australia and New Zealand, /l/ is consistently pronounced dark; and indeed, realizations may be pharyngeal rather than velar, or in other words, pronounced with a restriction even further back in the vocal tract. In London English, there is a further allophone of /l/, namely a vocalized (or vowel-like) realization finally or before a consonant: in sell, tall, people, help, /l/ is typically realized as a high or high mid back vowel like [υ] or [o]. For younger speakers, vocalization is also taking hold in medial position, in words like million; and the process is also spreading beyond London, as part of the shift towards so-called ‘Estuary English’, a mixture of SSBE and London English which is arguably becoming a new standard for young people, especially in urban centres in the south of England.
The other English liquid consonant, /r/, also provides plenty of scope for realizational differences. /r/ is typically an alveolar or slightly retroflex approximant for SSBE and GA, but at least in medial position, is frequently realized as an alveolar tap in SSE (the tap is also a common realization in South African English). In some parts of the north of England, notably in Northumberland and County Durham, a voiced The other English liquid consonant, /r/, also provides plenty of scope for realizational differences. /r/ is typically an alveolar or slightly retroflex approximant for SSBE and GA, but at least in medial position, is frequently realized as an alveolar tap in SSE (the tap is also a common realization in South African English). In some parts of the north of England, notably in Northumberland and County Durham, a voiced uvular fricative [ʁ] is quite commonly found, although this may be receding gradually.
In other areas of northern England, this time notably Yorkshire, Tyneside and Liverpool, [ɹ] appears as an allophone of /t/, typically between vowels and across a word-boundary, as in not on [nɒɹɒn], lot of laughs [lɒɹə …],get a job [ εɹə …]. In Merseyside, voiceless stops are very generally realised as fricatives or affricates in word-final position, so that cake, luck, bike will be [keIx], [lυx], [baIx]: whereas in Scots and SSE the appearance of [x] in loch constitutes a systemic difference, as there are minimal pairs establishing an opposition of /x/ and /k/, in Liverpool the velar fricative is clearly an allophone of /k/, so that the accent difference between, say, SSBE and Merseyside English in this respect is realizational, but not systemic.
Turning to vowels, one particularly salient example involves the FACE and GOAT vowels, which in SSBE, NZE and Australian English are pronounced consistently as diphthongs. In GA, the FACE vowel is diphthongal, while the GOAT vowel may be a monophthong; and in SSE and SgE, both are monophthongal, with the predominant allophones being high-mid [e] and [o] in both accents. The NURSE vowel in SSBE is mid central; the same phoneme in NZE is very generally rounded, while in SgE it is typically raised to high-mid back unrounded
, or high back unrounded [ɯ] (as we might expect, Hokkien has
, Malay has both
and [ɯ], but both lack
).
Sometimes, although these realizational differences have no direct impact on the phoneme system, they do lead to neutralizations of otherwise consistent contrasts. For instance, we saw in the last section that SgE speakers raise /ε/ to [e] before plosives and affricates; the monophthongal pronunciation of /e/ as [e] in FACE words, and the lack of any systematic vowel-length distinction in SgE means that the contrast of /ε/ and /e/ is suspended in this context, leading to identical pronunciations of bread and braid, or wreck and rake. It is also possible for realizational differences in vowels to lead to allophonic differences in consonants. For instance, right at the beginning of this book, we identified an allophonic difference between velar [k] and palatal [c], with the latter appearing adjacent to a front vowel. In SSBE, SSE and GA, this will mean that velar realizations will be produced in cupboard and car, palatals in kitchen and keys. However, the distribution differs in other varieties of English, depending on their typical realizations of the FLEECE and KIT vowels. In NZE, FLEECE has a high front diphthong, so that keys will still have [c]; but no fronting will take place in kitchen, since the KIT set in NZE has central [ə]. On the other hand, in Australian English, KIT has a rather high, front [i] vowel so that kitchen will certainly attract a palatal [c]; but in some varieties at least, the diphthong in keys is central [əI], which will therefore favor a velar allophone of /k/.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
